Late last year America’s Best Companies shared tips on naming a business.  At the top of their list was to make it "memorable, quirky, and unique."

Much more recently (on Tuesday) I saw this post from Lennie Rose on her blog for Big Ooga, a Chicago area resource for finding and connecting with accomplished entrepreneurs, in which she shares how she came to choose that name.  Big Ooga "sounded so Google, so Yahoo, but with a honk," she writes.  You have it admit, that name is definitely memorable in the vein of those other, now household name sites/businesses.

This got me thinking about applicant firms for our workplace award over the years that have succeeded – in addition to because of their progressive employee engagement, team building, and other people practices – by choosing a name that stands out in the minds of stakeholders including customers, suppliers, and investors.

Here are 8 such companies (* indicates an award winner; follow the link to learn more about them on our website):

1. Big Ass Fans
2. Boingo Wireless
3. Gentle Giant Moving*
4. iRobot*
5. Jump Associates*
6. King Arthur Flour*
7. Skullcandy
8. The Redwoods Group*

How important was being "memorable, quirky, and unique" when it came to naming your business?

View full post on Winning Workplaces

Incoming search terms for the article:

• inurl:comment page 1 activity

Well, three things have changed:

1. Inc. has a new website for their event (same dates and city/venue, though),
2. The conference has been retitled/rebranded as a Leadership Conference (it had been called "Creating Competitive Cultures [C3]"), and
3. Best of all if you have not yet registered, you can still get in at the early bird rate through next Friday, September 10.

Visit the new website for this event and mark your calendar.  With Inc.’s promise to turn you into a "smarter, more proactive and responsive business leader," you will be better equipped to improve employee engagement for a more profitable and productive workplace culture.

View full post on Winning Workplaces

Read more on U.S. Department of State

This conclusion would be wrong, however, argues Tyler Leverty, assistant professor of finance in the University of Iowa’s Tippie College of Business.  According to this Newswise article, which references Leverty’s paper "Dupes or Incompetents: An Examination of Management’s Impact on Firm Distress," some CEOs significantly improve a firm’s performance, while others hurt it.

Writes Newswise,

[Leverty] found … good CEOs can remove their firms from regulatory scrutiny 8 to 16 percent faster than a poor manager.  And in insurance companies that are going out of business, a more talented CEO can get a better return on the firm’s assets by up to 10 cents on the dollar.

The takeaway is that events and other learning opportunities that deliver a good ROI for leaders are worth the investment – even in tough times.  This is why Winning Workplaces is excited to partner with Inc. Magazine to host the Creating Competitive Cultures (C3) Conference in Denver on October 27-29, 2010.  As Inc. says on their C3 website, CEOs and other attendees can expect to learn "the newest leadership strategies for developing the best possible company culture, one that results in a loyal, motivated, inspired, and focused team."

Click here to learn more about this event.  You’ll want to register by tomorrow, August 31, to get the early bird rate, a $300 savings.

View full post on Winning Workplaces

Read more on Team Pilipinas

But then last week they raised the topic again; linking to this article by Chris Grams, SmartBrief wrote:

An increasing number of companies are taking a relaxed approach to worker management, letting staff decide for themselves when they take vacations and how they spend their time at work.

The emphasis on the word "relaxed" above is mine.  It’s only one word, but in my opinion in terms of leaders taking something away from their summary, it’s an important one.  "Relaxed" can imply "quick and easy."  In fact, getting your workplace culture and productivity to a place in which your organization can truly succeed with a "no policy" vacation policy requires a lot of time and, especially, buy in and long-term commitment from leadership.

I think of the pinnacle of an unlimited vacation policy as the visible part of an iceberg – there’s a whole lot more going on under the surface than what’s apparent:

What’s your take on this trend, and on the team building progress and other people practices work that needs to happen before it’s feasible to jump on it?

View full post on Winning Workplaces

Read more on Zawya

I had a "wow" moment yesterday when I was reviewing my post history in our Compendium software and realized today’s post will be our 900th.  900 blog posts in roughly 800 days (our blog has been running since June 4, 2008) – that works out to about one new post per day on employee engagement and team building strategies to help small businesses create a more productive workplace.

In addition to the writing I do here to (hopefully) make your work life easier, I also follow over 100 blogs in Google Reader, choosing some of the best stuff from them to share here as well as on Twitter.  In all this time I’ve picked up on some important best practices when writing business blog posts – along with some things to avoid.

I want to focus today’s post on the latter to help you draw in and better engage your readers, and – addressing what CEOs and others who hold the purse strings care about – get them to take a desired action that meets your goals or helps your bottom line.

Here’s my top 5 list of things to NOT do when business blogging:

1. Truncate your RSS feed.  In layman’s terms, this means setting up each new post so the reader only sees a bit of teaser text in their RSS feed (explained here if you don’t know what this is), and must click through to your blog to read the full article.  I’m on the same page as Techdirt CEO Mike Masnick as to why this is a bad business decision.  I’m sorry, but I look at this the same way I do a pay wall: you’re putting a barrier in front of me, and my gut reaction is to leave.
2. A "link dump" or "flashback" to an earlier week or month of posts.  I’ve seen a growing number of blogs do this, and although I do get why they do so (more targeted, quality links help with search engine optimization), it’s really a disservice to the reader.  A link dump says to me, "I’ve found this collection of articles, but I don’t care enough about your time to put any kind of analysis or framework around them…and I’m sure you have an hour to kill reading all my links until you get to the last one."  A flashback is even worse; usually it’s a linked list of dates corresponding to posts – that tells me nothing about what I can expect to read by clicking through.  You have to ask yourself if even your most engaged readers will go with you on your stroll down memory lane.  I guarantee a huge percentage of them will not.
3. Use too much "inside" language.  There’s a prominent blog I follow, which I won’t name, where lately almost all of the posts are about the author’s spouse – who is not relevant to the title (read: promise) of the blog.  This author has written some greater material over the years, but lately I’ve been tempted to hit "Delete" next to that blog for this reason.  The lesson?  Keep your first-time readers in mind and don’t veer too far off course from the promise to your readers stated or implied in your blog title.  (Or, do it but then change your blog title/focus.)
4. Write too many posts per day.  Speaking of moves that are great for SEO but bad for the average RSS follower, don’t publish so many posts per day that it becomes burdensome for your average reader to keep up.  How many posts/day are too many?  My number is five.  Tip: Survey your readers to learn the max that they’re comfortable with, and don’t go over it.  (Side note: A number of the blogs I’ve seen that publish what I consider to be way too many posts/day accomplish this volume by enlisting guest writers.  If your goal is build relationships with these folks and to get great SEO at the expense of the average reader’s time, then by all means keep doing what you’re doing.)
5. Write posts that are too long.  Frankly, this was not a concern of mine when I started writing here.  But the more I’ve written with the reader’s time in mind, and seen this come up again and again as a blogging best practice, I’ve tried not to do this.  Right now, in my mind, this post is getting to be too long, and I’m at 734 words.  That’s about 100 words shy of the average, feature-length article on getting employees engaged in our quarterly newsletter.  Too long for everyday consumption, so this list is ending…now.

What’s on your list of pet peeves or things to avoid when blogging for business results?

Image credit: oz 2 designs

View full post on Winning Workplaces